I think it's good to be tentative about accepting Native American storytelling as true fact, but I also think it shouldn't be dismissed. The book made a point of saying they did not use Native American stories in their research for this book, but that hopefully in future years such an endeavor would be made. Even if Native Americans don't know anything about the effigy mounds created by their ancestors, their culture and stories can still provide relevant information.
The more we learn about culture in current tribes, the more we can learn about the past. It's especially important to talk with Native Americans now to learn what we can because their stories live on in the oral tradition...and the more the years pass, the more the stories change and the less accurate they become. There are certain aspects of their history that have remained solid throughout generations, however, and I think they provide insight into the past that shouldn't be overlooked (such as bird symbols, dances, etc.).
Here are some links to videos of Native American storytellers as well as links to sites about Native American culture past and present:
I agree with you on the idea that Native American storytelling should be considered when analyzing their culture. However, I don't think that researchers were dismissing the storytelling completely. I think they realized that they can't just rely on that as evidence. I would be really surprised if they disregarded Native American storytelling all together.
ReplyDeletethis is a really controversial issue, with people lined up on both sides. I think you are right that some validity should be seen in Native American versions of the past.. although the earlier the better. I mean, it is better if it is attested in the 19th century than if the ideas suddenly appear.
ReplyDelete